Watch Now
Passing the exam is not the same as being secure. Most regulated organizations have a cyber GRC program that gets through exams and audits, and many stop there. Findings get closed, the examiner leaves satisfied, and the risk of a breach has not changed.
Join Randy Lindberg, Lucas Hathaway, and Aaron Kirkpatrick for a panel discussion on moving from a program built to satisfy examiners to one that reduces risk. They will cover why exam-driven programs stall, how to tell if your controls are working, how to use risk data to decide what to fix next, and how to show the board that security is improving.
Key takeaways
- Why a clean exam can hide a weak security posture, and how to tell which one you have
- How to turn the risk assessment from an exam deliverable into the tool that decides what you fix next
- How to tell whether a control is reducing risk or just producing evidence
- How to cut exam-driven busywork and put the time into things that lower risk
- How to report to the board on security posture, not just exam results
- How to bring AI risk into the program without adding a second full-time job
On Demand Webinar